te or federal incidental take permits

 


DELTA


Captain Stan Koenigsberger

Captain Steve Smith of the Bay Area "Smith" fishing clan has been fishing Alaska's Kenai Peninsula for 24 years. 800.567.1043
 

March 04, 2015    Headlines

 Delta Stripers & Sturgeon

Delta Report
By Dave Hurley
Sturgeon fishing was solid for some on Monday 3-2 with Captain Bill Clapp of Bill’s Sport Fishing out of Martinez putting his two deckhands, Joe Connell of Benicia and Chuck Soden of Sacramento, onto slot-limit sturgeon at 59 and 52 inches on uncured salmon roe near Buoy 2 in 30-plus feet of water. He said, “The fish bit on both tides, and we had two others come unbuttoned along with a few solid bites. The fish were running in stretches, and there was no reason to move because the sturgeon would come back through in groups.”
James Nguyen at Dockside Bait in Pittsburg reported slow action on Tuesday 3-3 despite great weather without wind. A few anglers were out in the Pittsburg area, but they weren’t catching. They will have ghost shrimp in the shop for the weekend, and there is currently a supply of grass shrimp.
Delta Wood Bomber’s Pro Staffer, Kenji Nakagawa of Lodi, went out in the central Delta in the San Joaquin River system on Monday night, and they hooked three stripers using a 6-inch Wood Bomber. He said, “The fish were in the 7 to 9-pound range, and the one that came unbuttoned was around 13 pounds. We marked a ton of quality fish, and there seemed to be a good concentration of fish in a small area around a couple of miles where the water was cleanest.”
Delta Wood Bombers also has a new member of their Pro Staff, known as ‘The Bomb Squad.” Kris Huff of Stockton is the latest addition, and we have a personal connection. Kris’s father, Kevin, and I go back to 1st grade together at St. Luke’s Catholic School in Stockton, and we went to school together through high school. Kevin is one of the first guys outside of my grandfather that I fished with as a young boy. Glad to see the passion stayed in the family.
Jim Pickens of the Fishermen’s Friend in Lodi was able to get out of the shop on Monday, and they found some striped bass trolling in the San Joaquin River system. Kind of looks like Eddo’s to me, but it could be the north side of Webb Tract on the San Joaquin.  Trollers have been finding good action within the past week working out of Korth’s Pirate’s Lair, so there must be a concentration of fish around the mouth of the Mokelumne.


Sturgeon fishing had been tremendous in lower Suisun Bay throughout the week, but the action came to a sudden stop on Sunday 3-1 with six-pack boats that were scoring up to 4 limits of sturgeon reporting only one or two bites for a long day. The water temperature has dropped from 60 to 55 degrees within the week in response to cooler evening temperatures and high winds, and the sturgeon have spread out throughout the system.
Jay Lopes of Right Hook Sport Fishing defied the odds on Sunday with three legal fish and an oversized released on lamprey eel. He said, “It was a tough bite which was much different than we have been experiencing, but we were able to find fish in three different spots as we moved around in order to drop in on the small groupings of sturgeon.” Lamprey eel was the bait of choice for Lopes, and he said, “I haven’t landed a fish on salmon roe in the past several trips.”  

Captain James Smith of the California Dawn put in legal sturgeon at 51 and 57 inches on Saturday both above and below the Benicia Bridge before experiencing Sunday’s problematic bite with 4 shakers and an oversized released for 20 rods in the water. Smith will stay in Martinez until the first weekend in April where he will be targeting stripers and halibut in the bay. Smith said, “I expect
a good year for halibut since the commercial draggers are offloading some big weights right now.”
The striper bite above Rio Vista had been terrific earlier in the week, but the bite slowed considerably on Sunday. Captain Scott Feist of Feisty Fish Service has been experiencing great action trolling deep-diving P-Line Predator Minnows in rainbow trout or red head/silver body above the Rio Vista Bridge, but Sunday’s trip was limited to an 8-pound striper along with some shaker bass. He said, “Something dramatic happened today, and the wind muddied up the water with the sediment still hanging on and not dropping out of the river. The top of the incoming tide has been bringing the clearest water, and once the river clears, I am expecting excellent results. The bait fish will arrive with the increased visibility, and the areas around the West Bank and the Old Dairy should open up.”
The Mokelumne River Bridge at Highway 12 in San Joaquin County will closed on Friday, March 6
th at 10:00 p.m., and it will remain closed throughout the weekend before reopening at 5:00 a.m. on Monday, March 9th.
On the San Joaquin River, as throughout the Delta system, the water temperature dropped drastically within the past week due to the cold evening temperatures in the low 30’s and the constant winds.
Alan Fong of the Fishermen’s Warehouse in Sacramento confirmed the solid bite for bass with Ken Mah winning Saturday’s Angler’s Choice tournament out of Russo’s Marina with a 32 plus-pound limit. Fong was punching the floating hyacinth mats with Sweet Beavers or D-Bombs under a 1.5-ounce weight earlier in the week along with tossing Senkos or chatterbaits.  The hyacinth is green and growing in this unseasonably warm winter, but spraying the aquatic vegetation is expected to start this week.
J. D. Richey of Richey’s Sport Fishing has been working the clear pockets of water on the San Joaquin River, and he said, “The periods of heavy wind have turned the water off-color, but the San Joaquin is looking better. The action for stripers was decent this week, but it wasn’t red hot as the bouncing barometer and cooling water temperatures have affected the action.  We haven’t been keeping fish, but the two I cleaned this week were already spawned out despite being February. This week will be very telling as the water continues to clear.” He has been either tossing swimbaits or trolling in the stained water for stripers to 15 pounds, but there have been a number of undersized fish in the mix.

Captain Mike Gravert of Intimidator Sport Fishing confirmed the high winds and dropping water temperatures contributed to changes within his approach, switching from trolling to drifting live bait during the week. He said, “It was all about the quantity of numbers as we had to weed through plenty of rats to locate keeper-sized stripers. That’s a good sign that things aren’t going to explode and then end quickly. Things are just going to get better every day.” All of the fish they kept this week were milting males.

Captain Stan Koenigsberger of Quetzal Adventures out of Bethel Harbor is running a novel idea this spring, a Kid’s Boating and Fishing class for five days during spring break.  The camp is limited to 4 boys/girls between 8 and 16 years of age, and it will cover a number of topics, including: making leaders, releasing fish properly, reading charts, docking, and basic navigation. Information on the camp is available at http://DeltaFishingGuide.com/kids.


Sturgeon fishing remained outstanding in lower Suisun Bay with great scores from six-pack boats reported throughout the week. Captain Chris Smith of the ‘Captain Hook’ out of Martinez put in two legal sturgeon at 59 and 43 inches on salmon roe on Thursday along with a 7-footer released and another legal fish lost at the boat.  He said, “The action has been terrific, and my one client released the big oversized and landed the upper slot limit fish.”
Jay Lopes of Right Hook Sport Fishing has also gotten in the hot sturgeon action with 9 keeper or oversized fish released on his last 4 trips in Suisun Bay. He went striper trolling on Thursday in the upper Delta above Rio Vista, and they landed a total of 14 keeper stripers to 8 pounds. He said, “When we saw fish on the meter, we landed them on deep-diving lures from 12 to 18 feet, but a bit of boat pressure scattered the small schools of fish. This usually doesn’t happen in deep water, but there isn’t a lot of volume in the river.” Lopes added, “We didn’t’ land any milting males on Thursday, and although the fish looked new to the system, many of the keepers were long and thin.” He will be bouncing back and forth between boats to fish stripers in the upper Delta as well as sturgeon in Suisun Bay.
On Friday 2-27 Captain Scott Feist with Feisty Fish Guide service reports great action through the week. he has been finding easy limits of stripers with most being quality 6 to 12 pound fish. He has been working the backwaters of the Delta and will be targeting stripers through early May. He is already over half filled for the season so if you want to fish with Scott during the peak of the run I suggest you get on the phone. Scott is one of our sponsors and we ask readers to support those who make this site possible.

For largemouth bass, Randy Pringle, the Fishing Instructor, said, “The water temperature in the San Joaquin River dropped 4 degrees from 60 to 56 degrees this week in response to the cooler evenings and high winds over the weekend.”  As a result, the spinnerbait and crankbait bite died, but they found solid action on rip baits in the mornings adjacent to rocky structure on the incoming tide. He said, “We fished sunny banks with rock since the bass wanted warmth, and the fish were holding from the banks to 6 feet in depth in weedy locations.” The grade of bass were in the 3-pound range, and they tried the reaction baits to no avail before switching over to the Berkley Havoc Flat Dawg in greenpumpkin gold blue on 10-pound test with fluorocarbon in 4 feet of water of deeper on the outgoing tide. He said, “We were able to find some larger fish in the 4 to 5-pound range, and soon we put together a 18 to 20-pound limit on the afternoon outgoing tide with the Flat Dawg.” The fish were mostly males with no giant bass, but he did hook an estimated 7-pound plus fish that ripped off line before coming unbuttoned in the heavy weed growth.” Pringle added, “It was a heavy fish, and I couldn’t budge him on the 8-pound test.”



Tunnels Opponents React to Field Poll Finding:
Public Opposition Reflects What We've Heard
Governor Has Chance to Rethink a Sustainable Solution

Sacramento, CA – Restore the Delta (RTD), opponents of Gov. Brown’s rush to build water export Tunnels that would drain the Delta and doom sustainable farms, salmon and other Pacific fisheries, today said that the Field Poll finding that two of three voters do not support the massive water export tunnels project called on Gov. Brown to “rethink his water policies and embrace a new, sustainable water solution." 
"Gov. Brown does have the vision and experience to recognize a dead end, and to abandon the doomed BDCP tunnels, which violate the Clean Water Act, degrade Delta families’ drinking water, and threaten salmon extinction,” said Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla, executive director of RTD. “For $67 billion, Californians get no new water, lose our fisheries and spend generations paying to subsidize huge, unsustainable industrial agriculture on unsuitable, drainage impaired Westside San Joaquin Valley lands.  That money would be better spent on alternatives that will make more water available to all Californians: recycling, storm water capture, conservation, groundwater cleanup and recharge etc. It’s time for a new, sustainable solution that makes new water, creates long-term jobs, promotes regional water independence and preserves fisheries and sustainable farms.”


Delta Flows: February 16, 2015

 “We can follow the example of those who remembered that the role of an activist is not to navigate systems of oppressive power with as much integrity as possible, but rather to confront and take down those systems.” – Derrick Jense

Navigate or Confront

By: Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla

This week, Tim Stroshane finished preparing Restore the Delta’s first Protest response to the State Water Resources Control Board, specifically the Board’s January 27, 2015 Notice of Temporary Urgency Change Petition (TUCP). The TUCP is the Board’s decision to modify D-1641 for the months of February and March, weakening Delta outflow standards, water quality standards, and setting modified allowances for water exports during this period of drought. (Click here to read Restore the Delta’s Protest to the TUCP; we also suggest that readers review the comments made by Bill Jennings on behalf of the California Water Impact Network.)

The State Water Resources Control Board is in a difficult position. Sources close to Restore the Delta tell us that Tom Birmingham, General Manager for the Westlands Water District, is seeking to unleash Armageddon on the Board’s Executive Director, and board members because in their January notice they declined to allow the Department of Water Resources and the Bureau of Reclamation even greater intermediate export levels. We understand that Westlands Water District and other powerful agribusiness interests are organizing busloads of farmers and farmworkers to show up at the Public Workshop on the TUCP on February 28, 2015 to press the board into allowing even more water exports. In addition, there is another push at the Federal level, with a letter penned by Senator Feinstein (D-Westlands), and the usual list of Central Valley Congressional Reps who think it is completely appropriate for the Federal Government to intrude in issues that are supposed to be settled at the State level. (Click here to see the story on Senator Feinstein’s letter.) So much for no further secret negotiations in Washington D.C. – as if the ideas behind the Senator’s letter were vetted in the light of day.

Restore the Delta has genuine respect and compassion for the staff and board of the SWRCB because we know firsthand how much energy and strength is required to stand up to moneyed, well-connected political interests that believe they can simply demand what they want from the system: water on demand, regardless of the law. And for that, they deserve our support.
That does not mean, however, that the TUCP as written is a healthy compromise that we can abide by while fisheries are collapsing during a drought that was made worse through years of mismanagement by the Department of Water Resources, the Bureau of Reclamation, State and Federal Fisheries Agencies, and prior lack of enforcement by the State Water Resources Control Board.
We are on the verge of losing Delta smelt, winter-run Chinook salmon, steelhead, and green sturgeon because the original standard (D-1641) was not enough to protect fisheries, and its enforcement has been regularly violated for years. And now the big agribusiness growers of King, Fresno, and Kern Counties are planning to push the board to claim every last drop of water during the fourth year of a drought so that they can harvest their unsustainable almonds at the expense of Pacific commercial fishing communities, Bay and coastal fisheries, Delta fisheries, Delta municipalities, and Delta family farming communities. Three counties are looking to dictate water policy for the other 55 counties of California – never mind the economic and environmental impact on the river watersheds, the Delta, and the Bay. Plus, the Metropolitan District, as indicated by a graphic on their website, used twice as much of its stored water from 2013 to 2014, as it did from 2012 to 2013. It has failed to conserve its resources we believe so that a “crisis” could be manufactured to turn public opinion in Southern California to support unlimited Delta exports and the eventual construction of the Delta tunnels.
That is why we are asking our supporters who have time to join us on Wednesday, February 18th, at the Public Workshop on the TUCP – to respectfully, yet thoroughly confront a dysfunctional system that must be changed before the estuary collapses and before the supporting Delta watershed is completely depleted.
Following these administrative process is hard for the average person on the street. We know; it’s hard for a small organization like ours. But, the decisions made in front of the State Water Resources Control Board over the next few years will set the fate of the Delta and water management for the State for generations.

How drought management plays out in the Delta
By: Stina Va

People were left dumbfounded at the meeting called by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) on its plan for emergency drought barriers along key Delta channels held on February 12th at the Clarksburg Community Church.
If the drought continues to be serious, DWR’s plan would install three temporary emergency rock barriers Steamboat and Sutter Sloughs near their confluences with the Sacramento River. A third barrier would be built across False River, which opens into Franks Tract, a large flooded island in the central Delta. The barriers would be constructed with large rocks, through which a culvert would pass to allow smaller flow of water and, potentially for fish passage. They would stay in place from May through November.
According to DWR, these barriers would be needed in order to have enough good quality fresh water to carry the state through the fall months, which are often dry in California. They will be paid for from funds left over from Proposition 50, originally passed in 2002. These funds were originally allocated for the Franks Tract Project (this was another plan to install gates in the Delta for fish). Marshall stated that $27 million has already been approved just to install the barriers. Further taxpayer money would also be needed to mitigate impacts later on and to remove them in the fall.
“We were scared to death,” exclaimed Paul Marshall, chief of the Bay-Delta office of DWR. His staff expects very high salinity levels in various parts of the Delta if the barriers are not installed to block tidal salt water. In the absence of winter storms, the big reservoirs owned by the state and federal governments upstream might be required to send stored water down the rivers to expel the salts to protect Delta exports, and would force the Delta export pumps to shut down to prevent public health violations of water quality.
Even more important, the state and federal reservoirs have much more water now than they did at this time last year. Shasta has nearly 750,000 acre-feet more now than at this time last year when it had just 1.7 MAF. Oroville has about 280,000 acre-feet more, and Folsom is at 102 percent of normal, with over a half-million acre-feet in storage.
The only thing that DWR seemed sure that it could mitigate was negative impacts to Delta boating and recreation. using a “universal boat trailer” – an idea that set the Delta locals roaring with laughter. The trailer would enable boats of any size to be lifted around the barriers.
“Please email the photos of this universal boat trailer,” a Delta resident asked. “We will do that,” Marshall quickly promised. Another Delta local skeptically commented that boat trailers would not be needed, due to the growth of water hyacinth that would intensify because of the planned barriers.
Delta people in attendance were clearly well informed, asking a variety of challenging technical questions. Most of these questions were left unanswered since last year’s meeting on drought barriers. “We’ll get back to you on that,” Marshall replied repeatedly, almost robotically. Yet at the same, he reminded Delta residents that DWR is not required to submit formal responses to comments (leaving us skeptical that Marshall’s promise to circulate photos of the phenomenal universal boat trailers may never occur).
Delta residents voiced concerns over impacts on water quality and public health, impacts on traffic, public safety and economic impacts to their islands (which are just recovering economically, crop harvests, and concern about endangered Delta fish extinction (specifically Delta smelt). Still others asked whether delta levees would be undercut by these barriers, and also why DWR has not followed any other suggestions regarding placement of the barriers in other parts of the Delta.
Remarkably, to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act, DWR hopes the proposed drought barriers can be approved with a mitigated negative declaration, meaning that agencies would not have to prepare or release a more detailed environmental impact report on the project.
Anna Swenson of North Delta CARES suggested that public members request a public meeting through the federal U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, who are considering the permit for these drought barriers. In a concern that echoed last year’s issues with the Bay Delta Conservation Plan’s documents, Swenson also insisted that DWR extend the public comment deadline by three weeks, since its environmental documents on the barriers are over 200 pages long. The current deadline for public comments to DWR on the mitigated environmental declaration will be due March 6.
Several members of the public urged DWR to prepare an environmental impact report on the project, but Marshall disregarded these requests. “I don’t want to make false promises to you,” he said.
As the meeting came to a close, Marshall reemphasized, “We hope beyond hope that the drought never gets to a point where we get to these measures [installing drought barriers].”
“We are their dinner plate,” one audience member commented in frustration. The room erupted in applause. The barriers looked to him like, “in essence, a water grab under the guise of [protection from] salinity.”
To watch video of the meeting recorded by Gene Beley of the Central Valley Business Times, click here.

Chipping away at all watershed protections
By: Stina Va and Tim Stroshane
A new Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) report warns that various state agencies will be tempted to put private priorities ahead of public benefits when spending taxpayer funds from the recent voter-approved Proposition 1, unless the Legislature steps in to clarify statewide water and environmental priorities.|
“State funds should only support the portion of the project that provides state-level public benefits. Some departments, however, have indicated they would consider using bond funds to support certain categories of benefits that are often private,” Legislative Analyst Mac Taylor wrote in the LAO report, released on February 11, 2015.|
The report, titled, “The 2015-16 Budget: Effectively Implementing the 2014 Water Bond,” calls for passage of special legislation after holding public hearings to clarify “public benefits” and actions for oversight and accountability in order to ensure that Prop 1 funds are spent cost effectively and consistent with long-term state priorities on water.
Statewide water policy goals include are supposed to include reducing reliance on the Delta for imported water supplies elsewhere in California, keeping fish populations in good condition below dams, doubling salmon population levels and ensuring that water quality in the state’s rivers and lakes is protected from any degradation. To see a list of statewide water goals, we recommend that you read the bullet points of 
page 2 and 3 of our Environmental Water Caucus letter to the Water Commission.
But the LAO report is incoherent and incomplete on these goals. With help from the Environmental Water Caucus later this year, Restore the Delta hopes to make sure state legislators are better informed about the water bond’s policy framework than the LAO has provided here.
|State departments in charge of developing grant guidelines and choosing specific projects for Prop 1 investments are the usual group of bureaucratic actors in water policy. These include the California Water Commission, the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA), the Department of Water Resources (DWR), the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), and the Wildlife Conservation Board.
The Wildlife Conservation Board a separate and independent Board under the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, is authorized to consider granting bond funds to buy instream flows to protect fish.
This particular program is corrupt because it will use taxpayer funds for something the public is already entitled to regulate through the state’s public trust doctrine. There are legal cases holding that local governments also have a duty to weigh actions under the public trust doctrine. This program, as well as funding for surface storage projects that will have a negative impact on the watershed and Delta were why many grassroots environmental groups, including Restore the Delta, opposed Proposition 1 last fall.
Various conservancies, including the Delta Conservancy are designated in the water bond to implement grant programs focused on ecosystem restoration projects statewide. (See Figure 4 of the LAO report for bond allocations and implementing departments.)
The Governor’s 2015-2016 budget appropriated $533 million from the Legislature to the state departments, including $2.7 billion for water storage. These funds are to be continuously appropriated by the CWC, but this part of the water bond is the only section where a state agency must write regulations to implement the grant program.|
Eligible storage projects include likely boondoggles like the expansion of Shasta Dam, and construction and operation of Sites Reservoir in the western Sacramento Valley and Temperance Flat Reservoir on the San Joaquin River just above Millerton Lake east of Fresno. All of these projects have been found to cost billions while yielding only small amounts of new supply, and probably none in drought years.
Other types of eligible storage projects include groundwater storage and remediation, as well as natural projects like Sierra mountain meadow and groundwater recharge area restoration and protection, which are likely to be far more cost-effective and environmentally benign.
Mr. Taylor, the state’s legislative analyst, recommends the Legislature designate the CNRA as the central entity responsible for regularly reporting to the Legislature on bond activity and outcomes. (The agency already plays a role in overseeing almost most other departments involved, except for the State Water Resources Control Board, which is under the California Environmental Protection Agency.) The CNRA also indicated that it would ensure that conservancies’ grant selection processes are competitive and are used for primarily water-related purposes.|
A public benefit is generally defined as something that does not have clear private benefits, such as recovering populations of listed fish species.|Taylor’s report highlights that public benefits should be long-term and that projects should generate “additional” benefits, meaning, “benefits above what would have been achieved in the absence of state spending and that such benefits would not [otherwise] be provided by private parties or other levels of government.”
In one example Taylor examined intentions by DWR to count water savings as a public benefit under water use efficiency project proposals for Prop 1, he asserted, “water use efficiency measures might not result in additional water being left in streams for fish species.” “Some of those water savings may be used by the grantee for other purposes or by other water users who would otherwise not receive water under their right,” he pointed out.|
“Grant guidelines will play a critical role in ensuring that the most effective projects are chosen and that funded projects are adequately monitored to ensure they meet their desired outcomes,” the report read. (We wrote an article last week about (
Last week, we wrote about the issues in developing Prop 1 grant guidelines at the Delta Conservancy’s most recent board meeting, click here to read about it.)
SWRCB and DWR existing grant guidelines do not give preference to the Prop 1 requirement for projects that use innovative technology, “and the departments have not indicated whether they intend to include such a preference.” Moreover, some proposals made by the Governor already conflict with guidelines that require competitive processes and primarily water related objectives, such as the construction of biking trails.

Clearly, Proposition 1 leaves a lot of room for misuse of taxpayer funds. In light of the fact that most of these agencies are the same actors that are involved with planning of the disastrous Bay Delta Conservation Plan tunnels project and other mismanagement of Delta water supply and standards, it is even more important to stay involved with the water bond implementation process.

Upcoming Events:
USAFishing proudly supports the many fishery and wildlife organizations that benefit anglers and hunters throughout Northern California. If you or your organization needs to get the word out or are looking to promote an event please contact us at fishsite@aol.com so we can inform our readers.
 

Golden Gate Salmon Association Events Calendar

 


Party Boat Information and Reservations around the Bay

The Happy Hooker is running halibut and striper trips out of Berkeley 2008 +1.510.223.5388

California Dawn is running sturgeon trips from Berkeley +1.510.773.5511

Caught Fish? Looking for timely informative updates? Check out a FREE trial to the Northern California Hotsheet, California's fastest growing fishing newsletter. The Hotsheet is emailed three to four evenings per week direct to your desktop. No hunting the web for information or waiting on an outdated magazine to arrive in the mail. These in-depth reports keep you on top of what is happening TODAY so you can catch more fish tomorrow! Just $3.50 per month when you subscribe for one year. You can receive a free week's trial copy by e-mailing a request to hurleyjacks@aol.com

 

 

 

Google


www usafishing

USAfishing.com Copyright © 2005 All rights reserved